Skip to main navigation Skip to main content
  • KSIR
  • Contact us
  • E-Submission

KJIR : Korean Journal of Interventional Radiology

OPEN ACCESS
ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICY
FOR CONTRIBUTORS

Articles

Case Report

CASE 17 흉곽출구부에 설치한 정맥 스텐트의 근위부 이동: 스텐트 재삽입을 통한 치료 Proximal Migration of Venous Stent Inserted in Thoracic Outlet Region: Treatment with Stent Reinsertion

박상준 , 이도연 , 원종연 , 박성일 , 이종태 , 유형식
Korean J Interv Radiol 2001;8(1):17.
Published online: December 31, 2001
연세대학교 의과대학 진단방사선과
  • 136 Views
  • 0 Download
  • 0 Crossref
  • 0 Scopus
prev
Key Words
Veins, stenosis or obstruction, Stents and prostheses
Case
A 60-year-old women
Clinical History
End stage renal disease diagnosed since December 1999 with a long-standing diabetes mellitus and hypertension. Peritoneal dialysis for 6 months and hemodialysis from June 2000 due to the aggravation of uremic symptoms were done. Hemodialysis was initially done with permanent catheter through the left and right subclavian veins (SCV), but discontinued due to SCV stenosis. Left AVF was created but failed; subsequently, right side AVF was created for hemodialysis. The patient was admitted for PTA of the right SCV.
Diagnosis
Right subclavian vein stenosis and stent migration
Imaging Findings and Interventional Procedures
Initial venogram obtained prior to any intervention treatment shows a focal stenosis of the right innominate vein (Fig. 1). A 240-cm long exchangeable guidewire was snared and retrieved from the puncture site in the femoral vein. PTA was then performed with a 12×20-mm balloon, but the stenotic portion was not relieved. A 16×50mm Wallstent (Boston Scientific, Watertown, MA, U.S.A.) was then deployed to cover from the right SCV to the right innominate vein followed by poststenting dilatation with a 12×20mm balloon (Boston Scientific, Natick, MA, U.S.A.) (Fig. 2). Venogram taken immediately following the complete deployment of the stent shows the relief of stenosis as well as patent venous flow (Fig. 3). However, followup Chest PA taken on the following day showed (not shown here) the downward migration of the stent, and venogram taken on the following day shows the downward migration of the stent, locating in the SVC and persistent stenosis in the same costoclavicular region, at the distal end of the previously inserted stent(Fig. 4). Subsequently, an additional, 16×50mm sized, Wallstent was again deployed followed by the poststenting dilatation with a 12×40mm balloon(Boston Scientific, Natick, MA, U.S.A.) (Fig. 5 and 6). Venogram taken after the insertion of the second stent shows patent venous flow throughout the stents with the disappearance of collateral vessels (Fig. 7).
Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Discussion
According to the study done by Kalman et al, the most common cause of upper extremity central vein stenosis/occlusion was secondary to an indwelling catheter, followed by so called, “thoracic outlet syndrome”. Treatment modalities applied in radiologic intervention to relieve upper extremity central vein stenosis/occlusion include thrombolysis, balloon angioplasty and stent. Among them, stent insertion is the last resort to relieve stenosis, especially when balloon angioplasty and surgical decompression fail, and Wallstents are preferred due to its radial flexibility with arm motion. In deployment of a stent in the costoclavicular region, the issue of stent fracture or extrinsic compression at the thoracic outlet causing stenosis or venous occlusion has been a concern. Thoracic outlet syndrome occurs when mechanical compression of the subclvian vein (SCV) by the scalenus anticus tendon posteriorly, subcalvius tendon anteriorly, and exostoses that can arise from the superior margin of the first rib at the thoracic outlet. The degree of impingement is aggravated with abduction of the arm. Successful surgical decompression by first-rib resection, scalenectomy and circumferential venolysis has been documented. Moreover, a case with successful interventional treatment solely with metallic stent has been published. However, in this case, instead of kinking or compression or fracture, a migration of the stent occurred, and it was successfully treated by the insertion of an additional stent. Therefore, when the deployment of a stent across the costoclavicular region to relieve stenosis/occlusion, all the possible complications arising from it should be taken into consideration seriously, and a careful follow-up is advised.
References
1. Kalman PG, Lindsay TF, Clarke K, Sniderman KW, Vanderburgh L. Management of Upper Extremity Central Venous Obstruction Using Interventional Radiology. Ann Vasc Surg 1998; 12:202-206. 2. Azakie A, McElhinney DB, Thompson RW, Raven RB, Messina LM, Stoney RJ. Surgical management of subclavian-vein effort thrombosis as a result of thoracic outlet syndrome. J Vasc Surg 1998;28:777-786. 3. 윤창진, 정진욱, 박재형,등. 중심정맥 협착 및 폐색에 대한 경피경관 혈관성형술과 스텐트 삽입술. 대한방사선의학회지 1998;39:1083-1089. 4. Sheeran SR, Hallisey MJ, Murphy TP, Faberman RS, Sherman S. Local thrombolytic therapy as part of a multidisciplinary approach to acute axillosubclavian vein thrombosis (Paget-Schroetter Syndrome). J Vasc Interv Radiol 1997;8:253-260.

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

CASE 17 흉곽출구부에 설치한 정맥 스텐트의 근위부 이동: 스텐트 재삽입을 통한 치료 Proximal Migration of Venous Stent Inserted in Thoracic Outlet Region: Treatment with Stent Reinsertion
Korean J Interv Radiol. 2001;8(1):17  Published online December 31, 2001
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
CASE 17 흉곽출구부에 설치한 정맥 스텐트의 근위부 이동: 스텐트 재삽입을 통한 치료 Proximal Migration of Venous Stent Inserted in Thoracic Outlet Region: Treatment with Stent Reinsertion
Korean J Interv Radiol. 2001;8(1):17  Published online December 31, 2001
Close